Skip to Content

Coronavirus information for Feinberg.

Download the full-sized Document of Disaster and Mass Casualty Incident Responses by Intensive Care Units: A Scoping Review Protocol
Download the file


Download Analytics Citations

Export to: EndNote


This file is not currently in any collections.

Disaster and Mass Casualty Incident Responses by Intensive Care Units: A Scoping Review Protocol Open Access (recommended)

An a priori scoping review protocol submission to the Northwestern DigitalHub (an institutional repository for the research and scholarly output of Northwestern Medicine) following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols.


Resource type(s)
Mass casualty
Critical care
Intensive care unit
All rights reserved
Moffet, Eric Warren
Wescott, Annie B
Critical care has displayed an interest in the field of disaster and mass casualty incident response (2). A disaster refers to a man-made or natural event requiring resources from outside a local community to return to pre-event status (3). An incident occurs secondary to similar hazards, requiring an emergency response to protect life, however, may not require resources from outside a local community (4). A mass casualty incident focuses on healthcare system capacity, where casualties rapidly exceed capabilities (5). Here we focus on the timeframe of acute response by intensive care units (ICUs) themselves: a relief phase - where lifesaving and mitigation efforts dominate - and a subsequent recovery phase - where efforts return systems to pre-event status. Significant infrastructure, personnel and equipment resources are required to operate ICUs (6). Disasters and mass casualty incidents are known to result in an influx of critically ill patients (2). Thus, ICU populations must be thought of as especially at risk.Yet, there remains a paucity of well-compiled data from the front-lines of ICU response initiatives, hampering evidence-based guideline production (2). Disaster research theory, though, is well-established (3). Categorical, continuous, or even narrative data reported by responders in the midst of response initiatives represent evidence (7). It is possible that through initial publication and valuating of such reports, we may illuminate intervention effects, variation in experience and practice, and identify gaps and inconsistencies in the literature.The purpose of this scoping review will be to compile and analyze ICU disaster and mass casualty incident response experiences. We intend to characterize ICU experiences - reported by ICUs themselves - to organize quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data, in the form of categorical and continuous items reported, will be assessed. Qualitative analyses will be undertaken through narrative inquiry of anecdotes. Outcomes of interest include identification of trends, analyses of existing reports for consistency, typical experience strengths or weaknesses, lessons learned, and best practices. This scoping review represents the first published data compilation and analysis of ICU disaster and mass casualty incident response initiatives.
DigitalHub. Galter Health Sciences Library & Learning Center
Date Created
Subject: MESH
Mass Casualty Incidents
Intensive Care Units
Critical Care
Grants and funding
No sources of support or funding were provided for this review. Authors are academic staff at Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.

File Details

File Properties
Mime type: application/msword
File size: 34.2 kB